 |
| Credit: The Franklin Institute |
Everybody loves science museums. Their fun and interactive
way of presenting science reconnects you with your childhood self, when you
were curious, when you wondered, and when you were so amazed that you could
only manage to say, “Wow!” But what is it like to work at a science museum?
On Wednesday, we hosted Jayatri Das, PhD,
to describe her career engaging the public with science as the Chief
Bioscientist at The Franklin Institute. As you would expect, her transition
from the lab into the museum was cultivated by a strong interest in outreach
and teaching. After receiving her PhD from Princeton, she gained experience as
a Christine Mirzayan Science and Technology Policy Fellow developing programs for the Marian Koshland Science Museum in Washington, DC.
Following a short post-doctoral appointment, she landed a position with The
Franklin Institute, an opportunity that she partly ascribes to fortuitous
timing, as PhD level positions at museums are rare.
In her job she embraces a new paradigm for how science
should interact with society. The goal is no longer public understanding of
science. Rather, she urges we should strive for public engagement with science. “We
want to communicate to our visitors that they are part of the conversation on
how we use science and technology,” she says.
Science and technology do not exist in a void. Jayatri
describes that:
1) Values shape technology
2) Technology affects social relationships
3) Technologies work because they are part of systems.
As an example, consider nanotechnology. This field has
opened new possibilities to create quantum computing, high-tech military clothing,
flexible inexpensive solar panels, clean energy, simple water filters, and new
cancer treatments; even invisibility cloaks and elevators into space have been
envisioned. But which of these technologies are developed will depend on the
values of those funding the research and the circumstances driving market
demand for them. Priorities would be different for a wealthy businesswoman in
Japan, a US-trained Iraqi solider, a European who lost a spouse to cancer, and
a cotton farmer in India.
As she points out, “Investments [in R&D] are being made
by people with values different than most of the world’s population.”
Therefore, it is important to challenge people to think globally.
Why are science museums a great place for these
conversations? First, they provide trusted and stimulating information. Second,
they are a place where people can reflect on science, technology, and the
world. And third, they are a place for conversation because many visitors
attend in groups.
Part of her job involves designing the many ways that The
Franklin Institute engages the public with science, which in addition to
interactive exhibits includes public programs, digital media, and partnerships
with schools and communities. For instance, she recently led a public discussion
about concussions in sports. The all-ages audience was presented with the
neuroscience of head trauma and testimony from former Eagles’ linebacker Jeremiah
Trotter, and then they discussed what age kids should be allowed to play tackle
football.
Because science and technology are so integrated into our
lives now, conversations like these are crucial. In order for breakthroughs to
be beneficial for society, they have to interact with public attitudes and
values. This communication between science and society occurs naturally at
science museums, so they offer fulfilling positions for people like Jayatri who
are motivated to connect the frontiers of science with casual visitors.
Interested in volunteering? You can find information here.